Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. McCamic v. McCoy

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1981No. 14973PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Justice:

In this original mandamus proceeding, the relator, a practicing attorney, seeks to challenge the constitutionality of certain regulations promulgated at the West Virginia Penitentiary at Moundsville. He contends the regulations unduly restrict the hours during which attorneys may visit inmates. He also maintains that the regulation requiring the search of his person and briefcase before entering the prison is unconstitutional. Finally, he asserts that the attorney conference room is so inadequate that it provides no privacy for communicating with his client and therefore…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. RichardsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Daily Gazette Co. v. Committee on Legal Ethics of West Virginia State BarWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Smith v. W. Va. State Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Bailey v. TrubyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Mayers v. BarteWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API