Legal Opinion

Noble v. Delaware & Hudson Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 11, 1980No. 199-79PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarney, C.J.

This action relates to the upkeep of a fence between the plaintiff landowner’s property and the defendant railroad’s right of way. The allocation of fencing responsibilities between property owners and various railroads has been a matter of statute for more than a hundred and twenty-five years. Davis v. Central Vermont Railway, 88 Vt. 460, 461, 92 A. 973 (1915) (citing 1849, No. 41, § 44). The supervisory authority formerly exercised by the public service board was transferred to the transportation board in 1975 by 3 V.S.A. § 3104(a) (3) (1975, No. 120, § 1), and, under that authority, this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hodges v. ThacherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1851
  2. Davis v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  3. Amodeo v. Town of ReadsboroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Muzzy v. Chevrolet Div., GMCSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  2. In re Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  3. Muzzy v. Chevrolet Div., GMCSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API