Legal Opinion

Canadyne-Georgia Corp. v. Continental Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 8, 1993No. 92-8547PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATCHETT, Circuit Judge.

In this lawsuit arising out of claims of contamination of the environment, we affirm the district court’s summary judgment ruling that the appellant failed to give timely notice to insurers as the insurance policies required.

FACTS

This action involves a chemical manufacturing and formulating plant in Fort Valley, Georgia, and stems from the pesticide and chemical contamination at the Fort Valley Plant site and the Peach County Landfill site *1549in Powersville, Georgia, where the plant deposited waste over the years. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) placed both…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Richmond v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Protective Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  4. Caldwell v. State Farm Fire & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. South Carolina Ins. Co. v. CoodyDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Interstate Power Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. Canadyne-Georgia Corporation v. Continental Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API