Legal Opinion · Dissent

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utility Commission

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 20, 1993No. 3-92-609-CVPublished

1DissentPowers, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

THE STATUTE

Public utility companies pay franchise taxes. One may say that a utility’s ratepayers pay such taxes, in a sense, because they supply through payment of their utility bills the revenue from which their utility company pays its tax liabilities. Along with other taxes, franchise-tax payments enter into the calculation of a utility’s “net income” and, ultimately, the official rates by which a utility computes its customer billings. See generally, Public Utility Regulatory Act (PURA), Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 1446c, § 41(c) (West Supp.1993); Ron Moss,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Public Utility Com'n of Texas v. CoferTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Cobra Oil & Gas Corporation v. SadlerTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. United North & South Development Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Calvert v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. North Common School District v. Live Oak County Board of School TrusteesTexas Supreme Court · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API