Legal Opinion

Benitez v. Ferran's Estate

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 29, 1944No. 4000PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The purported appeal in this case is a backwash of Benitez v. Anciani, 1 Cir., 1942, 127 F.2d 121. After our mandate in this case went down, the District Court on March 9, 1943, upon motion of J. Octavio Seix, entered an order dismissing the bankruptcy proceedings. Carlota Benitez de Seix, J. Octavio Seix, and Jaime Seix Irahola filed a notice of appeal from said order, which had granted what appellant J. Octavio Seix asked for. On December 17, 1943, this court entered an order dismissing the appeals of J. Octavio Seix and Carlota Benitez de Seix for lack of diligent prosecution. On January…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Prudence Securities Advisory GroupSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Benitez v. AncianiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State of California, Department of Employment v. Fred S. Renauld & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  2. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Congregation Poiley TzedeckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  3. Mondakota Gas Co. v. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  4. Gerringer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  5. Mario Mercado E Hijos v. Jose M. Feliciano, Trustee, Matter of Puerto Rico Railroad & Transport Company, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API