Legal Opinion
State v. John F.M.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 9, 2008No. AC 25313PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, J.
On this remand from the Supreme Court, we are charged with the duty to determine whether the jury instructions were proper and whether the defendant, John F.M. was targeted in a selective prosecution scheme. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
As set forth in State v. John F.M., 285 Conn. 528, 940 A.2d 755 (2008), “[t]he jury reasonably could have found the following facts .... On April 22, 2002, the defendant lived with his wife, J, and her daughter from a prior relationship, the victim, who was seventeen years old. The victim, a junior in high school, stayed home from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- United States v. Pablo BerriosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- State v. DelossantosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. RoswellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1827
- State v. RodriguezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. FMSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. John F.M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008