Legal Opinion · Dissent

Caterpillar, Inc. v. Department of Employment Security

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 22, 1999No. 3—97—1022 through 3—97—1027 consPublished

1DissentJustice Koehler

I believe that the majority has written out of the statute at issue a crucial clause that materially affects who is and who is not entitled to unemployment benefits. Because we are not vested with the authority to rewrite legislation, or to excise portions of existing statutory law, I respectfully dissent.

This case arises out of a labor dispute between the parties. The defendants are six striking workers whose employment was terminated by their employer, the plaintiff, prior to the strike’s end. Following that termination, the defendants sought unemployment benefits. Principally at issue is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Abrahamson v. Illinois Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. AldridgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Illinois Power Co. v. MahinIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. American Steel Foundries v. GordonIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Nichols v. Department of Employment SecurityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API