Legal Opinion

Polk County v. State Public Defender

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 14, 1993No. 93-0065PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaROCQUE, J.

Polk County appeals a trial court order appointing defense experts at county expense in the trial of Bruce Brenizer. The county argues that sec. 977.05, Stats., requires experts be paid by the state public defender (SPD), and that the trial court erred as a matter of law by ordering it to pay for Brenizer's experts. Because we agree with the county, we reverse and remand for entry of an order directing payment through the office of the SPD.

While preparing for Bruce Brenizer's trial for first-degree intentional homicide, his state public defender, John Kucinski, filed motions for Ake experts.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Ball v. District No. 4, Area BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Lister v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Douglas County v. EdwardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Bence v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Edward Crowell v. State Public Defender v. Iowa District Court for Linn CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  2. POLK COUNTRY v. State Public DefenderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Turkow v. Wisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  4. Koller v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  5. State v. MinniecheskeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API