DeBacker v. City of Moline
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
James E. Shadid, Chief United States District Judge
Now before the Court are Motions for Summary Judgment by Defendant Jay Titus and the City of Moline. For the reasons set forth below, The City’s Motion for Summary Judgment [77] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, and the Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant Titus [78] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 as the claims asserted in the Complaint present federal questions under the Family Medical Leave Act of 1993 (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601, and…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Lori L. Vande Zande v. State of Wisconsin Department of Administration, James R. Klauser, Lee MartinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McClean v. Duke Univ.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2019
- Moss ex rel. Moss v. SingletonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015