Legal Opinion

Horowitz v. Fitch

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 17, 1963No. Civ. 20429PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of $1,000, entered upon a jury verdict in his favor in an action for damages for personal injuries and loss of use of his automobile. The action arose out of an intersection collision between the automobiles of the parties. Liability was admitted by defendant at the commencement of the trial. The main issue on appeal is the adequacy of the award.

To put the matter bluntly, the question before the jury for its determination was whether it believed appellant’s account of his subjective complaints of pain and suffering. It is apparent that the question was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State Rubbish Collectors Ass'n v. SiliznoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Seffert v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Gersick v. ShillingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. People v. HornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Roedder v. LindsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Windeler v. Scheers JewelersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Calhoun v. HildebrandtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API