Legal Opinion
North German Lloyd v. Elting
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 11, 1932No. 129PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChase, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
This alien was brought to the United States in accordance with section 2 (a) (4) of the above-mentioned statute (42 Stat. 5), which provides that the quota shall not apply to “aliens visiting the United States as tourists or temporarily for business or pleasure.” It is not claimed that the plaintiff acted in bad faith in bringing the alien here. We agree that it had no right to rely upon the visa to establish his claimed status as a quota exempt. United States ex rel. Spinosa v. Curran (D. C.) 4 F.(2d) 613, affirmed 4 F.(2d) 614 (C. C. A. 2). But the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Compagnie Francaise De Navigation a Vapeur v. EltingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- North German Lloyd v. EltingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Dollar S. S. Line v. HydeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- United States ex rel. Spinosa v. CurranDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1923
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cosulich Societa Triestina Di Navigazione v. EltingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Lloyd Sabaudo Societa Anonima Per Azioni v. EltingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Lamport & Holt, Ltd. v. EltingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- United States v. Phelps Bros. & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Transatlantica Italiana v. EltingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932