Legal Opinion
Lloyd Sabaudo Societa Anonima Per Azioni v. Elting
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 1, 1932No. 125PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChase, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
At the trial below, the plaintiff offered evidence, not presented to the Secretary of Labor, in support of its claim, that the aliens had been subjected to a competent examination abroad and its exclusion is now claimed to have been erroneous. Such a contention fails to give effect to the language of the statute and the decision in Oceanic Steam Navigation Company v. Stranahan, 214 U. S. 320, 29 S. Ct. 671, 53 L. Ed. 1013. The basis for the imposition of such fines is twofold, (1) the faet of bringing aliens to this country who belong in the classes…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. StranahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- In Re FassettSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lamport & Holt, Ltd. v. EltingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Navigazione Generale Italiana v. EltingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Hamburg-American Line v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Cosulich Societa Triestina Di Navigazione v. EltingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Lloyd Sabaudo Societa, Anonima Per Azioni v. EltingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.