Legal Opinion

Lindblom v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1924PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, J.:

Gustav E. Lindblom, on whose life on August 17, 1922, defendant wrote a policy of insurance for $10,000, died November 14, 1922, from carbolic acid poisoning. He administered to himself the draught which caused his death. The policy contained a provision that the defendant would pay double the amount of the policy, namely, $20,000, in case death was accidental. Another clause in the policy is as follows, “ If the Insured within one year from the issue hereof die by his own hand or act, whether sane or insane, this Policy shall become null and void and the Company will return only…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dakin v. . Liverpool, London and Globe Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Paltrovitch v. Phœnix Insurance Co. of HartfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Partridge v. Milwaukee Mechanics' InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Howell v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. of BostonNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Shaw v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
  3. Mandi v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1932
  4. Richardson v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
  5. McVeigh v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API