Legal Opinion

Vishinskas v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 24, 1985No. 1 CA-IC 3280PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONTRERAS, Presiding Judge.

This is a special action review of a consolidated Industrial Commission award denying reopening of a 1981 claim but granting compensability of a 1983 claim. The issue on review is whether reopening as well as the compensability of the new injury claim should have been granted to avoid precluding subsequent reopening if the new injury proves to be merely a temporary aggravation of a previously undiscovered condition. Because the successive injury doctrine applies and application of this doctrine will not preclude reopening if the aggravation is temporary, we…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pearce Development v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. O'Donnell v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  3. Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Phoenix Cotton Pickery v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. Pearce Development v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  2. Johnson-Manley Lumber v. INDUS. COM'N.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  3. Dr. Pepper Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  4. In Re the Adoption of J.M.H.Montana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Southwest Desert Images, LLC v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API