SEBOLT v. United States
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION PHILIP M. SEBOLT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 2:20-cv-00009-JMS-MJD ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA in its official ) capacity, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff Philip M. Sebolt, a federal inmate, alleges that he is entitled to monetary relief because he received delayed treatment for a decaying tooth. The United States of America is allegedly liable under the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA") based on the theory that the delay in treatment…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Julian J. Miller v. Albert GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Pooja Khungar v. Access Community Health NetworCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.