Lyerly v. United States
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
L. Scott Coogler, United States District Judge
Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 27), Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 29) and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Evidence (doc. 34). Plaintiffs, Jonathan and Sharon Lyerly, brought this case based on tax penalties that they allege were wrongfully assessed by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). The Lyerlys seek a refund of overpayments, damages, and a declaration of their correct tax liability. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is due to be granted…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.