Wolford v. Andrews
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county, where the action was tried by Vanderburgh, J"., without a jury.
1Opinion of the Court
Gilfillan, C. J*
The action is brought upon defendant’s indorsement upon a promissory note, made by Samuel Stanehfield, payable to defendant’s order, and by the latter indorsed to plaintiff in this manner:
“For value received I waive notice and protest, and guarantee payment. , Thomas F. Andrews.”
The defendant might be held on this as a guarantor, and without reference to the question whether his liability as indorser was or became absolute. But the question, can he be held as an indorser, is presented, and we will decide the case on that point. There was no demand upon the maker, nor notice of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coddington v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Jaccard v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
- Coddington v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
- Carpenter v. ReynoldsMississippi Supreme Court · 1869
- Porter v. KemballNew York Supreme Court · 1868
3Cited by7 opinions
- Leach v. UrschelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Gleason v. ThayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Banner Grain Co. v. Burr Farmers Elevator & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Herweigh v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Lockwood v. BockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.