Legal Opinion

Fischnaller v. Sussman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1932No. 23630. Department OnePublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeeler, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for the •wrongful conversion of per sonal property consisting of steel railway rails. The plaintiff alleged that, prior to and during the month of September, 1929, he was the owner of approximately 110 tons of logging railroad rails, located at Carlisle, Washington; and that, between the months of September and November of that year, the defendant, without authority, right or permission, seized and converted the rails to its own use, and refused, on demand, to return them.

The defendant in its answer denied the material allegations of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wooden-Ware Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Bailey v. HaydenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Semple v. MorgansternSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Grays Harbor County v. Bay City Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Olin v. GoehlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  3. Pettaway v. Commercial Automotive Service, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Parks v. Yakima Valley Production Credit Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Wilson Motor Co. v. Lamping Motors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API