Legal Opinion

In re the State of Winston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 20, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding by trustees under the Last Will and Testament of Harry Winston for “advice and direction” pursuant to SCPA 2107, nonparty Charles A. Goldberger *639appeals from so much of an order and decree (one paper) of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County (Emmanuelli, S.), dated September 12, 1996, as, upon granting that branch of the respondent Bruce Winston’s motion which was for the imposition of costs and sanctions pursuant to 22 NYCRR part 130, (1) directed him to pay $7,500 to the Lawyer’s Fund for Client Protection, and (2) decreed that the Surrogate would recuse himself in all…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Muller v. MullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Jemzura v. MugglinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Principe v. Assay PartnersNew York Supreme Court · 1992
  4. In re Malinda V.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Bahlkow v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kamen v. Diaz-KamenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Tercjak v. TercjakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API