Legal Opinion

Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital v. Wodehouse

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 10, 1934No. 7026Published

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal taken from the decision of the Supreme Court of the territory of Hawaii rendered, upon an agreed ease submitted to that court in pursuance of sections 2371 , to 2374, inclusive, of Revised Laws of Hawaii 1925. The parties to the agreement are the Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital and Ernest H. Wodehouse and James L. P. Robinson, executors of the will of Mary E. Foster, deceased. The facts agreed upon by the parties may be briefly summarized as follows:

The Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital, which will be hereinafter referred to…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Rushing v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Sherman v. Richmond Hose Co. No. 2New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Stanley v. ColtSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  4. Fearing v. . IrwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. Adams v. CowenSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API