Legal Opinion
Mines v. Metagenics, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 13, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2022-3789Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AHMAD MINES FNP-C, THE INSTITUTE OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL MEDICINE, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 22-3789 (JEB) v. METAGENICS, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Metagenics, Inc. is a supplier of nutritional health supplements. One of its customers, The Institute of Multidimensional Medicine (TIMM), brought suit last year claiming that Metagenics breached its contract with TIMM regarding the sale of certain supplements. This Court granted Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss in October 2022. TIMM and its owner, nurse practitioner Ahmad…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.