Legal Opinion

Salas v. Clements

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1976No. 56624, (Calendar No. 1)Published

1Opinion of the Court

399 Mich. 103 (1976)

247 N.W.2d 889

SALAS

v.

CLEMENTS

Docket No. 56624, (Calendar No. 1).

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued May 4, 1976.

Decided December 27, 1976.

Lopatin, Miller, Bindes & Freedman (Michael H. Feiler, of counsel) for plaintiffs.

Leonard A. Baun for defendant.

WILLIAMS, J.

The issue in this case is whether plaintiffs, who claim they do not know the identity of an alleged intoxicated person who injured them, are barred from maintaining a cause of action under the Michigan dramshop act, because they did not "name and retain" the alleged intoxicated person as defendant as required by the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Salas v. ClementsMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Pacific Insurance Co., Ltd. v. Oregon Auto. Ins. Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API