Legal Opinion

H. Hackfeld & Co. v. Achi

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1905PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Circuit Judge. First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HARTWELL, J.

Tbis was a bill to foreclose a mortgage made July 1, 1899, by the defendant Achi to the defendant Monsarrat to secure the mortgagor’s four notes aggregating $40,000 and interest, payable respectively to Monsarrat’s order in six months, one year, two and three years from their date. At the same time Monsarratt gave the plaintiff his promissory note for $42,101.80 payable to the plaintiff’s order “within three years after date” with interest at eight per cent, and executed and delivered to the plaintiff an instrument reciting his above mentioned note and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Consolidated National Bank v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Linder v. LewisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1880
  3. Makainai v. Goo Wan HoyHawaii Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Western Electric Co. v. ReedyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Humburg v. Wong KwaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API