Keating v. Duxbury Housing Authority
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
1. In this eminent domain case, which was tried to a jury after having been tried before a judge (see G .L. c. 79, § 22), the plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict of $30,000. The judge had awarded damages of $104,000. There was no error in permitting one Forrest to testify as to the probability or improbability of obtaining zoning relief with respect to the property taken. By reason of training as a lawyer and membership on the board of appeals of Duxbury, Forrest possessed some specialized knowledge about what an owner of real estate might expect in the way of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- D'Annolfo v. Stoneham Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Rubin v. Town of ArlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Torre v. Harris-Seybold Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. MarkhamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Cataldo v. ZuckermanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Boston Edison Co. v. Massachusetts Water Resources AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Donahue v. DraperMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Croall v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.