Langdon v. Jaramillo
New Mexico Supreme Court
1DissentMoise, Justice
I find that L cannot agree with the' o.pin-' ion in this case, and accordingly' set forth my reasons. The majority has hot accorded any weight to the presentation in -the briefs and on oral argument, but is. content, with adherence to . the decision of this court in Arledge v. Mabry, 52 N.M. 303, 197 P.2d 884 (1948). In my humble opinion the holding in that case should not be considered as controlling here, and we should unequivocally overrule it insofar as its application would deny the right of the petitioners herein to register and vote.
Since the majority have not done so, I will briefly…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Fort Leavenworth Railroad v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. McGlinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Howard v. Commissioners of Sinking Fund of LouisvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Peyton v. NordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Commonwealth v. ClaryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.