Legal Opinion

Moore v. Doughtie

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1929No. 3277PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.

By this action Ross Moore seeks to recover judgment against *408J. E. Doughtie, T. S. Sholars, and Rusher Culver, in solido, for $1,148, or, in the alternative, judgment against each of them for $382.66%, with legal interest thereon . from judicial demand.

He alleges that they formed a partnership for the purpose of drilling for oil and gas, and to that end leased from him, at the price of $500 a month, under a contract terminable at their will, a drilling rig.

He further alleges that the lease was terminated on December 21, 1925, and that the price of the lease for the months ending November 21,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Nat. Bank v. Reclamation Oil Producing Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  2. Phillips v. RayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eva Ruth Bertrand, Individually and as Natural Tutrix of the Minors v. Forest CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. Cortiza v. RosenblatLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Industrial Loan Co. of Monroe v. NoeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Shalett v. Brownell-Kidd CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Eva Ruth Bertrand, Individually and as Natural Tutrix of the Minors v. Forest CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API