Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hansen v. Kootenai County Board of County Commissioners

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1970No. 10458Published

1DissentMcQUADE, Justice

I must dissent from the opinion and conclusion of the majority.

I

Consideration for the lease in the case before us is stated to be the improvements constructed on the Kootenai County fairgrounds. The determination that these improvements are adequate consideration rests on an acceptance of their appraised value of nearly $110,000 as the correct measure of the gain realized from the lease by the county. If these improvements are consideration for this lease, the adequacy of that consideration should be tested not against the $110,000 figure, but against the value of the county’s reversionary…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Scofield v. Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Edwards v. City of RentonWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Clark v. MurraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  5. Board of Education v. State Board of EducationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API