Tradesmens National Bank v. DiCarlo
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtPruyn, J.
The plaintiff obtained a judgment by default in an action against two defendants on two promissory notes. Prom the denial of her motion to open the judgment, the defendant Prances DiCarlo has appealed, assigning as error that the default judgment was entered without her knowledge and that as the ad damnum clause in the complaint claimed $2700 the court had no jurisdiction and the judgment was therefore a nullity. The first assignment of error has been abandoned, and the sole question on this appeal is whether the court had jurisdiction of this action.
The denial of a motion to open a judgment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gores v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. SchoenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Holmquist v. SpinelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Gaudio v. RomanovConnecticut Superior Court · 1962
3Cited by2 opinions
- Peoples Trust & Savings Bank v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- E. J. Kelley Co. v. CarlinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1966