Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lindner

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 11, 1985PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.

This appeal involves an interpretation of G. L. c. 263, § 5A (1984 ed.), a statute which requires the police to afford to an individual, charged with driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, “a reasonable opportunity” to be examined immediately by a physician of his own selection. We conclude that, in the circumstances here, the police have fulfilled their statutory responsibility, and thus that the defendant’s motion to suppress the results of his breathalyzer test should have been denied.

The testimony at the hearing on the motion to suppress is summarized as follows. Keith…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. NealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. AlanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. AndradeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. PaivaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SCHATVENMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. DurningMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. HampeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. RosewarneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. FinelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API