Legal Opinion

James R. Penny v. United Parcel Service

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 22, 1997No. 96-3890PublishedCited by 265 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVELY, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff, James R. Penny, appeals from the district court order granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this case brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The defendant, United Parcel Service (UPS), moved for dismissal in the district court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and now seeks dismissal of this appeal on that ground. Upon consideration, this court concludes that we do have jurisdiction over the appeal and that the defendant was entitled to summary judgment. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

I

A

Th…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Livadas v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by265 opinions

  1. Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. O'BRIEN v. Ed Donnelly Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  4. Robert Barnett v. U.S. Air, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Richard A. Sullivan v. River Valley School District, and Charles O. Williams, Superintendent, Individually and in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

260 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API