Legal Opinion
City of Whitehall v. Moling
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 22, 1987No. 86AP-1037PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFain, J.
Plaintiff-appellant, city of Whitehall, appeals from a judgment entered in the Franklin County Municipal Court sustaining defendant-appellee Robert C. Moling’s motion to dismiss the charges against him on equal protection grounds. We conclude that Moling failed to demonstrate that the city of Whitehall’s policy of selective enforcement of its ordinance violated his rights under the Equal Protection Clause. Consequently, we hold that the trial court erred in sustaining the motion to dismiss.
Whitehall Codified Ordinances Section 351.13(a)(1) broadly prohibits parking or storing commercial…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Celebrezze v. Thermal-Tron, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Elsaesser v. Hamilton Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- West Chester Twp. Bd. v. Speedway Superamerica, Ca2006-05-104 (6-11-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Cincinnati v. Fourth Natl. Realty, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- City of Brook Park v. ShortOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.