Borough of Atlanta v. Kirk
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The court did not err in allowing the intervention making the owner of the lot a party plaintiff, where the petitioner, the lessee, was seeking to prevent the enforcement of the ordinance restricting the right of parking in streets adjoining the lot.
The foregoing statement of facts does not contain many of the allegations in the petition and the answer, but does contain the substance of those allegations essential to be considered in the determination of the controlling question presented. Under the evidence in this record, we are of the opinion that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Commissioners of Habersham County v. Porter Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
3Cited by7 opinions
- Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. DatrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- McCord v. Ed Bond & Condon Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Gardner v. City of BrunswickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Medlock v. AllisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- De Pace v. Mayor and Council of WilmingtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.