Doe v. The University of Mississippi
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION ANDREW DOE PLAINTIFF V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-138-DPJ-ASH UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER This is a Title IX discrimination action; there are four motions before the Court. First, Defendants—the University of Mississippi, the state college board (and various officers), as well as the State of Mississippi itself—request summary judgment [269]. Second, Doe moves to strike that motion in part [288]. In the third and fourth motions, Defendants ask the Court to exclude three expert witnesses [271,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.