Legal Opinion

Doe v. The University of Mississippi

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided June 14, 2024No. 3:18-cv-00138Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION ANDREW DOE PLAINTIFF V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-138-DPJ-ASH UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER This is a Title IX discrimination action; there are four motions before the Court. First, Defendants—the University of Mississippi, the state college board (and various officers), as well as the State of Mississippi itself—request summary judgment [269]. Second, Doe moves to strike that motion in part [288]. In the third and fourth motions, Defendants ask the Court to exclude three expert witnesses [271,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API