Legal Opinion

Roney v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 20, 1930No. 5471PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of an offense under section 32 of the Criminal Code (title 18 U. S. C. § 76 [18 USCA § 76]). He made no motion in the court below for a directed verdict at the conclusion of all the evidence, and, in the absence of such a request, this court will not consider the sufficiency of the evidence unless it is satisfied that there has been a miscarriage of justice. Lockhart v. United States, 264 F. 14 (6 C. C. A.); Loewenthal v. United States, 274 F. 563 (6 C. C. A.). Our examination of the evidence leads us to the conclusion that no injustice has been done. Nor can the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Holmes v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Lockhart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
  4. Loewenthal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nailling v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  2. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. GallowayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API