Legal Opinion

Lockhart v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 12, 1920No. 3306PublishedCited by 16 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Eastern District of Tennessee; Clarence W. Sessions, Judge. Andrew P. Lockhart was convicted of an offense, and he brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

On February 7, 1919, Lockhart was indicted for violation of the Espionage Act (Act June 15, 1917, tit. 1, § 3, 40 Stat. 219, as amended May 16, 1918 [Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 10212c]). The first count alleged that “on or about May 26, 1918, and on divers other days between June 15, 1917, and October 15, 1918,” he made and conveyed certain false reports and false statements, with intent to interfere with the operation and success of the military and naval forces of the United Stales, and to promote the success of its enemies. In the second count he is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ledbetter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Frisbie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. West v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  5. Schoborg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tuckerman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
  2. Feinberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  3. Lurton Lewis Heflin, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  4. Nigro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  5. Albert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API