Legal Opinion · Dissent

First Huntington National Bank v. Gideon-Broh Realty Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1954No. 10560, 10561Published

1DissentLovxns, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the Court’s opinion in this, case.

The point of departure in my views from those expressed in the Court’s opinion rests on the proposition that the agreement and deed made by Switzer and wife, McCullough and wife to Meadows, dated the 27th day of December, 1919, was a contract of sale and purchase, with a proviso that at the end of twenty-eight years, Meadows was to pay one dollar and acquire the legal title. Clearly, the payments of $100.00 each month were payments of the purchase price by way of monthly installments.

The rule against perpetuities has been subjected…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Barton v. ThawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Gibson v. AlfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. West Virginia - Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. StrongWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Starcher Bros. v. DutyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Bancroft v. Maine State Sanatorium Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API