Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Curtis

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

The plaintiff heretofore served a bill of particulars. The defendants now move for a further bill of particulars. A verified bill of particulars was served by mail on August 11, 1941. The instant motion is made under subdivision (d) of rule 115 of the Rules of Civil Practice, which provides: “ Where a bill of par*214ticulars, or copy of the items of an account, served pursuant to demand or order is regarded as defective or insufficient by the party upon whom it is served, such party shall make an application, upon notice, for an order of preclusion or directing the service of a further bill. In…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kundolf v. . ThalheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  2. Zevely v. SinclairAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coffey v. Orbachs, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  2. Guilizio v. RiosNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Murphy v. CaponeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Montagna v. ProfetaNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Harbet v. FinkelsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API