Legal Opinion
Maksymiuk v. Puceta
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 23, 1932PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtField, J.
This is an action of contract, brought by Pitro Maksymiuk and his wife, Agafia Maksymiuk. The plaintiffs declared on an alleged promissory note for $1,000, seeking to recover a balance of $650 and interest from the defendant as indorser. The case was heard by a judge sitting without a jury, who made “Findings and Rulings” and found for the plaintiffs in the sum of $613.50. It comes before us on the defendant’s exceptions to the admission of evidence, the judge’s “Findings and Rulings,” his refusal to make certain requested rulings, including a ruling that *349“the defendant is entitled to a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Stoops v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Weiner v. D. A. Schulte, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Bray v. HickmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Fiske v. TolmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Welch v. WalshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Charles I. Hosmer, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Crimmins & Peirce Co. v. Kidder Peabody Acceptance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Oliveria v. OliveriaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Breen v. BurnsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- The Merchants National Bank v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.