Legal Opinion

McElhaney v. Auger

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 18, 1976No. 2-57869PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Justice.

This is an appeal from denial of postcon-viction relief. We affirm.

Petitioner’s action was predicated upon a claim that his 1966 rape conviction should be set aside because he was subjected to post-arrest lineup procedures which violated the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. His conviction was affirmed upon appeal. State v. McElhaney, 261 Iowa 199, 153 N.W.2d 715 (1967). No challenge of the lineup was made either at trial or in the direct appeal from conviction. When respondent filed a motion to dismiss based upon these facts, the trial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Walker v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Rinehart v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  3. Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. Carstens v. RansSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  5. Darrell E. Copenhaver v. John E. Bennett, Warden, Iowa State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  2. Emery v. FentonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  3. Berryhill v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  4. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  5. State v. DowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API