Legal Opinion
Tilbury v. Aames Home Loan
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 7, 2006No. 06-1214UnpublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PER CURIAM.'
Appellants, David and Ann Tilbury, appeal from the District Court’s Order dismissing their complaint and barring them from filing further civil actions related to this matter in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in a pro se capacity without prior leave of the court. We will affirm the District Court’s judgment and its decision to issue an order enjoining further pro se filings by the Tilburys.
The procedural background as well as the factual allegations underlying this cause of action are well known by the parties and need not be detañed here.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Alston v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Sherry J. Oshiver v. Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & BermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- D.O. ex rel C.O. v. BordenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- Abrahim Fata v. Charles Lang, et al.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- BONDS v. NJ JUDICIARY ADMINISTRATION OF THE COURTDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- BRAGG v. THOMASONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- FABER v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.