Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. Roettker

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

As heretofore staffed, the defendant below demurred to this petition, which was overruled.

The petition sets forth no ground for the granting of the- injunction other' than the claim that the levy contravenes above section of the Constitution of the United States, and this is the only point 'argued by the plaintiff below, defendant in error here.

The petition makes no claim that the tax levy offends against the laws of Ohio. Plaintiff could not successfully do so, since the question has been heretofore determined by the court, establishing the right to levy the municipal tax upon annexed…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Summit County Board of Education v. Medina County Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. Republic Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. People ex rel. Village of Inverness v. BarrettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API