Legal Opinion
State v. Adkins
Montana Supreme Court
Decided March 11, 2009No. DA 07-0245PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart
¶1 David Neil Adkins (“Adkins”) appeals from rulings of the Eighth Judicial District Court denying his untimely motions to suppress un Mirandized statements that led to the discovery of evidence which ultimately led to his conviction for felony Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs and misdemeanor Criminal Possession of Drug Paraphernalia. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶2 In April of 2006, Adkins was implicated in a methamphetamine distribution ring. The individual implicating Adkins also indicated that Adkins kept a small amount of methamphetamine at his residence. With the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. PataneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Sunburst School District No. 2 v. Texaco, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. PriceMontana Supreme Court · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. District Court of the Eighteenth Judicial District of MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. MorriseyMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- Baxter v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. EllisMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. C. AnkenyMontana Supreme Court · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.