Legal Opinion
Kansas, State of v. Rambo III
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided August 20, 2019No. 2:19-cv-02212Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 19-2212-CM-JPO JULIUS KING RAMBO, III, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Defendant Julius King Rambo, III, filed a “removal complaint” pro se, claiming that the State of Kansas violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel during his state criminal case. Magistrate Judge James P. O’Hara granted Rambo leave to proceed in forma pauperis and screened the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Judge O’Hara filed a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4), recommending that this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Louise Whitney v. State of New Mexico Charles Patrick, Employee of the State of New Mexico John/jane Doe, Unknown Employees of the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Ridge at Red Hawk, L.L.C. v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Drake v. City of Fort CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.