State v. Lilley
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtMoRRis, J.
Defendant contends that the court’s failure to instruct the jury on involuntary manslaughter constitutes prejudicial error.
In State v. Wenrich, 251 N.C. 460, 111 S.E. 2d 582, the North Carolina Supreme Court held that where there is evidence tending ,to show the commission of a lesser offense, the court, of its own motion, should submit such offense to the jury for its own determination. G.S. 15-170 provides that a person may be convicted of the charge in the indictment or of a less degree of the same crime.
“The necessity for instructing the jury as to an included crime of lesser degree than…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- State v. . SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. . StansellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. GuffeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. LemmondCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. TesenairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. BattsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.