In re Falanga

*84OPINION OF THE COURT

In this proceeding the respondent was charged with four allegations of professional misconduct. The Special Referee sustained all four charges. The petitioner moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee. The respondent cross-moves to disaffirm the report to the extent that it sustained Charges One, Two, and Three and to otherwise confirm the report.

After reviewing the record, we disagree with the conclusions of the Special Referee. We find, based on the evidence adduced, that the respondent is guilty of the misconduct alleged in Charge Four and confirm only so much…