Legal Opinion

New Mexicans for Richardson v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 6, 1995No. 94-2190PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRORBY, Circuit Judge.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether plaintiffs’ constitutional challenge to New Mexico’s restriction on the use of contributions solicited for or received in a federal election campaign for purposes of a state election campaign is ripe for review. We hold that it is, and accordingly, we reverse the district court’s order to the contrary.

BACKGROUND

In 1993, New Mexico enacted comprehensive election and campaign related legislation. That legislation provides, in pertinent part: “No contributions solicited for or received in a federal election campaign may…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. Miller v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  2. New Mexicans For Bill Richardson v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. Morgan v. McCotterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. CabralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  5. New Mexico v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API