Legal Opinion

McAlpine v. Resch

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 5, 1901No. Nos. 12,285—(185)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action in tbe district court for St. Louis county to remove a cloud. The case was tried before Cant, J., who submitted issues to a jury and found in favor of plaintiff. From a judgment entered pursuant to the findings, defendant Meinhardt appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

Defendant Mickel Resch, on May 8, 1899, made an entry of a quarter section in the Duluth land district, making the requisite cash payment to obtain title from the government, under 29 U. S. Stat. 246 (c. 316). The final receipt was delivered, upon which a patent issued to Resch on August 3 following. Immediately after the entry and issuance of the receipt, Resch- sold the land to plaintiff, giving him a warranty deed. Plaintiff did not record his deed until several months after it was delivered. He was in ill health and unable to attend to business. In August he went to the hospital, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Knight v. LearyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Bonfanti v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1858
  3. Loveridge v. ColesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Graham Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Stevens v. PattenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Beutel v. Joanis (In Re Investment Sales Diversified, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1984
  4. Republic National Life Insurance v. Marquette Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Nicholson v. CongdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API