Legal Opinion

Merriam v. Woodcock

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 15, 1870PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.

In a former action between these parties, the present defendants recovered compensation for services rendered under a contract with the present plaintiff, made with reference to her sole and separate estate, in which her husband was joined as codefendant. In defence of that action, the answer, afte* *327setting out the contract with particularity, alleges negligence and unskilfulness in the performance of the services required, in every respect, and charges that the services actually rendered were of no value. The case was sent to an auditor, who found, in accordance with the defendant’s claim,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burlen v. ShannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. West v. PlattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  2. Clement v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Jones v. Charles Warner Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1912
  4. Derderian v. UNION MARKET NATIONAL BANKMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  5. Harlow Realty Co. v. WhitingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API