Legal Opinion

Derderian v. UNION MARKET NATIONAL BANK

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 5, 1950PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

This is an action of tort brought by a mortgagor against a mortgagee to recover damages arising out of the improper and wrongful manner in which the mortgagee conducted a foreclosure sale of the mortgaged premises. The judge, subject to the plaintiff’s exceptions, denied various requests for rulings and found for the defendant.

The bank had previously brought a bill in equity to recover the balance due after the foreclosure sale on the promissory note which was secured by the mortgage and which Derderian had given to it. In his answer to the bill in' equity, Derderian had set up that the bank…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dearden v. HeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Mark v. Stuart-Howland Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Hebert v. DeweyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  4. Malone v. BianchiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  5. Zarthar v. SalibaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Willett v. WebsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  2. Hemmings v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
  3. Freedman v. WalshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  4. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Yentile v. HowlandMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API