State v. Johnson

Defendant appeals from two convictions for robbery in the first degree. One conviction was for violation of ORS 164.415(l)(a), the other for violation of ORS 164.415(l)(b). Defendant argues that because the robbery convictions involved the same victim and the same set of underlying circumstances, he should be subject to only one conviction. We affirm.

We recite the facts in the light most favorable to the state. State v. McFeron, 166 Or App 110, 112, 999 P2d 470 (2000). In June 1998, defendant attacked the victim while she was attempting to make a cash deposit for her employer at a Portland…